Non-religious Australians will cop the rough end of the stick if the Morrison government gets its way with the ‘religious freedom’ bill.
This is the key observation of Sydney-based barrister Dean Stretton, who voiced his concerns about the likely impacts on Australia’s fast-growing non-religious community in a submission to the government.
Dean argues that significant changes are required to the current draft bill to ensure that believers and non-believers are treated equally and protected against direct discrimination.
“The draft bill privileges religious belief over non-belief and introduces new forms of discrimination against non-believers. It should be redrafted to avoid these flaws,” he says.
“What I request is as simple as it is important: that the legislation be redrafted to recognise the equal human rights of non-believers.”
In one example, Dean points to clause 7 of the bill which protects beliefs held on religious grounds while failing to protect the same beliefs if held on non-religious, or philosophical, grounds. While a person who held that voluntary euthanasia was morally wrong on religious grounds would be protected, a person who shared that view on non-religious grounds would not be protected.
In another example, he says it is “extraordinary” that non-religious people are excluded in regard to the conscientious objection provision, which only applies to health practitioners who are of a religious faith.
“The fundamental error here, and in the draft bill generally, lies in treating freedom of religion as a standalone right. It is instead part of a broader right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, which includes freedom of non-religious belief,” says Dean.
“If freedom of thought, conscience and religion applies equally to atheists and agnostics – as well as religious believers – then it is wrong to privilege belief over non-belief, or to prohibit discrimination based on religious beliefs without also prohibiting discrimination based on non-religious, or philosophical, beliefs”.